Our division of labor for this speech is very clear. I have listed twelve sub-points, mainly to lay the foundation and provide accurate theoretical support for our topic of food waste. The part I am responsible for is the food standard, the summary of target customers, the needs of special groups and the similar examples and methods of using the app. I googled a lot of examples and references and put them in our group documentation. After the clear division of labor, I integrated the materials and wrote a speech at the same time. During the speech process, I thought our group’s theoretical knowledge and data support were perfect, which was very good in this link. After that, I took on the task of group activity for the speech. We are thinking about the content of group activities, and we have been thinking for a long time about what would be the best combination of games and interactivity. So I made use of a small Chinese program called I Have you have not, and adapted some elements of it to create the first activity of our group activity. I searched the Internet for some common food waste processes and videos, and then played them to everyone one by one, and asked them whether they had done such things while watching, hoping that everyone would realize that food waste is completely happening around us. But I admit there’s a lot I can do to improve. For example, I should regroup people before the game starts, and then start scoring points for each group, adding one point if you’ve done one of the things, and the person with the fewest points wins. At the same time, prepare some small gifts to arouse everyone’s enthusiasm, which will make our first group activity more interesting and energetic.
Summariz：
Generally speaking, this speech did not meet the expectations in my heart, and there are still many areas for improvement. Especially after watching the speeches of other groups, I summed up several questions. First, our content of the topic is not perfect enough, and the technical requirements for the extension of the topic and practical operation are not in line with reality. Second, I did not master the rhythm of the speech very well. I still want to learn from my two team members here. After all, my English is not that good, so their support and help for me are very good. Third, the arrangement of group activities was not as vivid as that of other groups, because I was in charge of the first part of the group activities. Perhaps due to communication problems, the group activities arranged in the follow-up preparation did not observe the group activities I designed, so the following group activities were not so well connected. This also fully shows that our cooperation is not so compatible, but in general, we still show our theme and the central idea of expression to everyone. I hope to get the teacher’s understanding and hope to perform more perfectly in the next activity.
The group work link：https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D8Dg9n-9TPrKF-A_KqLJJygJv7qCe4QV8G77RJ7weLw/edit
站点标题 